Firefighter’s Win Big-Stern Upholds SLRB Decision

20140102_113026_resized (2)

NKFFA Engine 5

North Kingstown
– Just as the word eviscerate is sure to evoke thoughts of carnage and plunder, the phrase “tautological and without merit” bespelled certain doom and nightmarish failure in battle to the Town of North Kingstown in its quest to keep its firefighters at bay.

On Monday, Judge Brian P. Stern, rendered his decision in the Town’s action against  the Rhode Island State Labor Board (SLRB) in opposition to its September 27, 2013 decision and order in favor of the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) North Kingstown Firefighters Union Local 1651 (NKFFA).

Charter argument nullified

“The Town’s argument – that the Labor Board has concluded that the SLRA and the FFAA conflict with the Town’s authority to unilaterally implement changes to the fire department’s organization guaranteed to the town through the Charter – is tautological and without merit.”  ~ Brian P. Stern, Justice RI Superior Court

The SLRB decision ordered the Town to immediately restore the firefighters’ schedule, hours of work, and hourly rate of pay to that which existed upon the expiration of the 2010-2011 CBA. The order required that every member of the department be made whole and assessed 12 percent annual interest from June 2012 through the date of payment.

Monday’s decision was a result of almost two years of Labor Board, Superior and Supreme Court briefings, hearings and rulings; a back and forth, up and down process riddled with adversity, innuendo and more than a little anti-union rhetoric on behalf of the Town, its Council and attorneys.

43320015The Town’s unilateral restructuring moved firefighters to a 56-hour week structure, resulting in shift extensions reaching 70-plus consecutive hours. Coupled with a decreased platoon structure, the combination wreaked havoc on the department, drawing concerns of public safety and unsafe working conditions for firefighting personnel.

Stern concluded that in interpreting the Town’s own Charter,  on which its implementation and argument in favor thereof were premised, the Town was actually adherent to collective bargaining.

This Court concludes that it is entirely possible to construe the Charter provision in harmony with the FFAA and SLRA, and so the Town is bound to compliance with the terms of both statutes, which require collective bargaining over the implementation of the restructuring plan.”

Town of North Kingstown engaged in Unfair Labor Practices

Court determined that the Town acted in bad faith.  (Photo by Tracey C. O'Neill)

Court determined that the Town acted in bad faith. (Photo by Tracey C. O’Neill)(Photo by Tracey C. O’Neill)

The Town argued that its unilateral implementation and restructuring of the fire department structure was not an unfair labor practice based on its aversion that it had negotiated in good faith during collective bargaining sessions, resulting in an impasse.

The Court disagreed finding that the existence of the FFAA, statutorily adopted and designed to forego impasse through arbitration, demands that unresolved issues be submitted to arbitration for resolution.

The Court in its decision also found that the Town was incorrect in asserting that the two requisite elements of impasse – bargaining in good faith and negotiation over mandatory subjects of bargaining- were satisfied. Supporting his “Unring the Bell” decision of December 2012 and the concurrent SLRB order, Stern ruled the unilateral implementation and restructuring necessarily unlawful.

Firefighters Arbitration Act Prevails 

In September, the SLRB found that the Town acted in bad faith in its unilateral implementation of departmental structure, shift and wage changes outside the realm of collective bargaining and in violation of the Fire Fighters Arbitration Act (FFAA).

The court found that the FFAA through its statutory arbitration process acted as a circuit breaker for impasse situations, due to firefighters’ legal forbearance of traditional labor remedies such as work outages, slow downs and strikes. 

In the decision, the court wrote:

The FFAA simply forecloses the possibility that an unresolved issue will ever graduate to intractable status – or even that it will remain “unresolved” for very long.It follows that the Labor Board had sufficient competent evidence to conclude that the Town’s unilateral implementation of the restructuring plan was an unfair labor practice because the FFAA forecloses the possibility of unilateral implementation as a legally cognizable outcome. It is not possible that a “point in labor negotiations at wihch agreement cannot be reached” will ever come to pass:  before any such point occurs, the FFAA demands that the parties submit their unresolved issues to arbitration where, by definition an agreement will be “reached,” because the arbitration panel will decide it.”

49780011Union President, Raymond Furtado, although confident of the Union’s eventual success, spoke of the long road to Monday’s ruling, the effect on his department, its members and the collective bargaining process.

“Today was a victory not only for the North Kingstown firefighters, but more importantly for the Firefighter’s Arbitration Act. The act was passed in the spirit of good faith bargaining and the fact that workers should have a say in how they are treated,” said Furtado. “Today reinforced the fact that the town bargained with us in bad faith and that they should be held accountable.”

Furtado and Local 1651 are currently in negotiations with the Town for Collective Bargaining Agreement 2014-2015. According to Furtado, the Town rejected two recent offers from the firefighter’s.

“All the North Kingstown firefighters have wanted through this entire debacle is to be treated fairly and with the same respect and manner any worker would be treated,” Furtado said. “We are clearly happy that we won, however we anticipate that the town will advance the case to the Supreme Court. We are confident that our Supreme court will recognize that this is a state that is supportive of collective bargaining and is not a right-to -work state. We look forward to the debate at the Supreme Court level, if necessary. We know that our case is just.”

State Labor Relations Board Petition to Enforce – Granted

Stern upheld the State Labor Board’s September decision with the exception of two directives, stating that the order satisfies statutory requirements and complies with the General Assembly’s directive to the Labor Board that it prevent a public employer, such as the Town, “from engaging in any unfair labor practice.”

Stern further found the SLRB Decision and Order was supported by substantial and competent evidence.

The Court stayed its Decision and Order pending review by the Supreme Court, the stay in effect based solely on the issue of a potential conflict with the High Court’s own stay of the firefighters return to their prior schedules.

Related Links



2 comments on “Firefighter’s Win Big-Stern Upholds SLRB Decision

  1. […] decisions in favor of the firefighters’ return to their previously known work structure. The Court and SLRB further awarded firefighters all back wages, benefits and interest penalty from the date […]

  2. […] Brian J. Stern in a January 2014, Superior Court decision found the Town’s claim lacking in legal […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: